. During his career,
John David spent six years at the University of California at San Diego,
at first in the Physics Department working on non-neutral plasmas and subsequently
at the Institute for Nonlinear Science pursuing his interests in bifurcation
theory. In 1989 he held visiting positions at the Mathematics Institute
at the University of Warwick and at the Institute for Fusion Studies at
the University of Texas at Austin. He joined the faculty of the Department
of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Pittsburgh in 1990.
John David's interests ranged from the physics of collisionless plasmas
to the mathematics of pattern formation. However, there was a common thread:
understanding the development and equilibration of instabilities in diverse
systems, be they Hamiltonian or dissipative. This workshop focused on pattern
formation in continuous systems, a subject to which John David contributed
greatly. He worked on developing group-theoretic methods for use in pattern
formation studies of dissipative systems and new techniques for studying
bifurcation phenomena in Hamiltonian systems associated with the emergence
of an eigenvalue from a continuous spectrum. The former area of research
was motivated primarily by his interest in parametrically driven water
waves (the Faraday system) and the latter by the beam-plasma instability
in the Vlasov-Poisson system.
The Faraday instability is a subharmonic instability and is therefore
associated with a Floquet multiplier at -1. John David's early work with
Edgar Knobloch and 8] discussed
mode interaction in the Faraday experiment in a circular container, focusing
on the dynamics of discrete time-T maps with -1 Floquet multipliers
of double multiplicity as appropriate for modes that break the O(2) symmetry
of the container. Of particular interest was the resulting classification
of the conditions under which the mixed patterns resulting from such interaction
drift azimuthally. Such rotating patterns were observed in experiments
by Sergio Ciliberto and Jerry Gollub. His subsequent and classic work on
the Faraday system in a square container [14]
was also motivated by Gollub's experiments. In this work John David focused
on understanding the hidden symmetries, both translations and rotations,
introduced into the Faraday system by Neumann boundary conditions. These
depend on the modes excited and on their degeneracy. John David's observation
that as a result there is a significant difference between the Faraday
system in a square container and one with D4 symmetry but in
a nonsquare container was confirmed in experiments by Gollub and David
Lane [16]. Related work on parametrically modulated
Hopf bifurcation in systems with O(2) symmetry [9]
predicted that such modulation would stabilize standing waves even in cases
in which traveling waves were preferred in the absence of modulation. This
prediction was also confirmed experimentally, this time in elegant experiments
by Victor Steinberg and David Andereck and their colleagues.
Throughout John David continued his studies of bifurcations in collisionless
plasmas. Using the technique of spectral deformation he developed in landmark
papers with Peter Hislop he was able to understand in detail the appearance
of a neutral eigenvalue (or mode) embedded in a continuous spectrum at
threshold for instability. In this problem, as in the closely related shear
flow problems for ideal fluids, the instability appears when the electron
distribution function or shear flow profile are gradually changed, for
example, by injecting a beam of fast electrons to create a bump on the
tail of the electron distribution or changing the pressure distribution
driving the flow. However, because of the presence of the continuum center
manifold theory cannot be used to study the resulting bifurcation. John
David's understanding of the structure of the linear problem led him to
consider the equilibration of the resulting instability using the instability
growth rate
as the bifurcation parameter. In a remarkable paper he showed that in the
limit of fixed (i.e. heavy) ions the instability saturates at
amplitude,
in contrast to the
amplitude familiar from dissipative systems. This result is nonperturbative,
and terms of all orders contribute to the equilibration as
.
Thus not only do these instabilities saturate at a much smaller amplitude
but they do not have to approach the equilibrium monotonically. The predicted
``trapping''
scaling agrees with numerical and experimental observations. Subsequent
work by John David's student Anand Jayaraman generalized these conclusions
to mobile ions showing that in this case the scaling changes to
.
While engaged in this work John David realized that very similar
mathematics applies to the Kuramoto model of phase-coupled oscillators.
This model consists of a large number of globally coupled oscillators with
frequencies drawn from a prescribed frequency distribution and exhibits
a remarkable ``phase transition'' as the strength K of the interaction
increases in which the oscillators begin to phase-lock. As in the Vlasov-Poisson
system the stability problem for the incoherent state has a continuous
spectrum and this state loses stability at K=Kc
when an unstable eigenvalue pops out of the neutral continuum. As a result
of a calculation to all orders similar to the plasma one John David showed
that the saturated amplitude (the fraction of synchronized oscillators)
scales like
for the Kuramoto model but scales like K-Kc for
more general couplings than assumed by Kuramoto. These results resolve
analytically several long-standing issues in both theoretical and numerical
studies of this important model.
John David wrote two influential review articles, one on basic bifurcation
theory [15] and one with Edgar Knobloch on the
use of equivariant bifurcation theory for studies of pattern formation
in fluid dynamics [12]. A bibliography of John
David's contributions to pattern formation and bifurcation theory is included
below.
John David was a consummate scholar, devoted to deep understanding of
important and challenging problems. His solutions to these problems were
always innovative offering a fresh perspective. At home both in physics
and mathematics John David was an invaluable colleague, generous with his
time and ideas, and a rare knack for explaining scientific principles to
friends, colleagues and students. His lectures were a model of clarity
and he was a much sought-after speaker. At the workshop his delight in
being back in the milieu he so loved was almost palpable. He will be greatly
missed by all of us.
- Edgar Knobloch
